Emergency Cardiac Surgery (ECS) is a element of cardiothoracic coaching. Citations are thought-about to symbolize a papers affect. Bibliometric analyses permit us to establish essentially the most influential work, and future analysis. We purpose to spotlight the important thing analysis themes inside ECS and decide their potential impression on cardiothoracic coaching.
Thomas Reuters Web of Science was searched utilizing phrases [Emergency AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results have been ranked by quotation and reviewed by a panel of cardiac surgeons to establish the top 100 cited papers related to ECS. Papers have been analysed by matter, journal and impression.
Regression evaluation was used to find out a hyperlink between impression issue and scientific impression.3823 papers have been recognized. Median citations for the top 100 was 88. The paper with the very best impression was by Nashef et al. specializing in using EuroSCORE (2043 citations). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery revealed most papers (n = 18:1778 citations).
The European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery coveted essentially the most citations (n = 2649). The USA revealed most papers (n = 55).The most ubiquitous subjects have been; danger stratification, circulatory assist and aortic surgical procedure.
A constructive relationship between journal impression reality and the scientific impression of manuscripts in ECS (P = 0.043) was deduced.This research is the primary of its form and recognized the papers that are prone to the contribute most to coaching and understanding of ECS. A papers affect is partially decided by journal impression issue. Bibliometric evaluation is a potent device to establish surgical coaching wants.
Characteristics and Fate of Pediatric Heart Disease Abstracts Presented at National Meetings.
BACKGROUNDThis research evaluated the traits and publication outcomes of pediatric coronary heart illness abstracts offered in nationwide conferences.METHODSThree years of abstracts (2012-2014) have been evaluated from 5 nationwide conferences: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Association of Thoracic Surgeons (AATS), American College of Cardiology (ACC),
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and American Heart Association (AHA). Each summary was assessed for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, time to publication, impression issue of the journal, and variety of citations related to the publication.RESULTSA complete of 1145 abstracts certified for inclusion. The majority of the abstracts originated from North America (80.8%) and have been single institutional (85.7%), scientific (92.5%), and retrospective (77.9%) research.
A complete of 767 abstracts (66.9%) have been revealed in peer-reviewed journals as full-length articles. More than 90% of the abstracts offered on the surgical conferences have been revealed as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals. In distinction, 68.8% of ACC abstracts 53.7% AAP abstracts and 61.4% of AHA abstracts have been revealed as manuscripts in a peer-reviewed journal. The median time to publication was shortest for STS abstracts (10 months) and longest for AHA abstracts (29 months).
The median impression issue for revealed manuscripts assorted between 3.Zero and three.5 for AATS abstracts, STS abstracts, ACC abstracts, and AHA abstracts. Manuscripts from AATS abstracts had the very best variety of citations.CONCLUSIONSOur information point out that the nationwide cardiology and cardiac surgical procedure conferences have grow to be a discussion board for presenting high-quality analysis, with>>90% of the abstracts offered in these conferences culminating in publication.